Hacker News
← Back

Winamp for OS/X

4 hours ago/65 comments/github.com
4 minutes ago by theoldgreybeard

Why does the title call it OS/X? It's macOS and it's described that way on the repo.

Unfortunately his is just a recreation rather than an actual port, since the license for the source that was released prevents derivative works.

Foobar2000 is the spiritual successor to Winamp and it runs on Windows and macOS as well as mobile.

40 minutes ago by runjake

Minor point: I read this as OS/2. The author may want to correct that. macOS naming and versioning is confusing enough.

macOS was never known as OS/X. It was formerly known as OS X and Mac OS X.

As a former OS/2 user, it really threw me off for a second.

5 minutes ago by zekyl314

100%! I first read as OS/2 as well, and was like interesting.

27 minutes ago by tracker1

Same, actually... I'd probably just say "for macOS" at this point, since it is the current term from what I understand.

Aside: the project seems interesting enough, didn't see support for (icecast) streaming listed in the project though, which although less common today still exists.

2 hours ago by Dwedit

The page itself has a more accurate description (Winamp *clone* in swift for OS/X) than the headline here.

Since the actual Winamp had a questionable source code release, it could feasibly have been ported to other platforms, so we need to know that it is in fact a clone, and not a port of the real Winamp.

19 minutes ago by echelon_musk

Every single time something like this comes up I feel compelled to mention Audacious.

See my previous comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32779590

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39965620

Like most days, I am using it right now on macOS.

an hour ago by Arubis

[MacAMP](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacAmp) was real and official, directly from Nullsoft, a million years ago.

4 minutes ago by stalfosknight

Why do people insist on still calling macOS "OS X" (or "OS/X" for that matter)?

an hour ago by antonyh

If it doesn't run on Windows, how can it call itself Winamp? Macosamp makes more sense.

an hour ago by rollcat

OS/Xamp perhaps.

Joking aside, there's Audacious[1], which is an excellent and cross-platform player, with support for Winamp skins. Also check out WebAmp[2] and the skin museum[3].

[1] <https://audacious-media-player.org> [2] <https://webamp.org> [3] <https://skins.webamp.org>

an hour ago by antonyh

OS/Xamp, pronounced Oh-sex-amp :o)

4 hours ago by hyperbole

A winamp clone for os/x - interested in learning swift, and wanted a stable version of winamp for os/x - two itches scratched

an hour ago by asimovDev

What was the most fun and least fun you had while learning Swift for this project?

I remember having trouble making a Swift UI for my C app because I forgot to disable sandboxing in Xcode project settings. Spent a frustrating two hours debugging

2 hours ago by mabedan

Nice. Maybe next step can be integration with one of the music services

2 hours ago by antonyh

Apple Music would seem the obvious choice.

Daily Digest

Get a daily email with the the top stories from Hacker News. No spam, unsubscribe at any time.