Adding to the article above ...
Editing a well-prepared index can be a pleasure,
the estimable Chicago Manual of Style tells us,
A poorly prepared one, however, presents serious problems. As an editor, you cannot remake a really bad index. If an index cannot be repaired, you have two choices: omit it or have a new one made ...
Also:
As a very rough guide, an average of five references per text page in a book will yield a modest index (one-fiftieth the length of the text), whereas fifteen or more will yield a fairly long index (one-twentieth the length of the text). [Printed books incur a marginal cost per word, remember.]
The old-fashioned way. Indexers used to handwrite or type preliminary entries and subentries on 3 x 5-inch index cards, then alphabetize and edit the cards, and finally type the index, while further refining it, on 8 1/2 x 11-inch sheets.
And finally,
For greatly expanded coverage of the present guidelines, along with alternative usages, consult Nancy Mulvany’s Indexing Books .... Anyone likely to prepare a number of indexes should acquire that work.
https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/CHIIndexingComplete....
Wasn’t this on the homepage yesterday?
> Second-Chance Pool
> Moderators will sometimes rescue a post which didn't receive a lot of upvotes and reset the submission time on the post. (This is also one of the reasons why the FAQ discourages deleting submissions).
> Relatedly, moderators can also invite users via email to resubmit a post which didn't get much traction.
https://github.com/minimaxir/hacker-news-undocumented#second...
Get a daily email with the the top stories from Hacker News. No spam, unsubscribe at any time.