Hacker News
an hour ago by aurareturn

Hidden door handles, button open doors when inside the car, only touch screen buttons, rear red turn signal lights.

Reverse these trends. They all suck and unsafe.

Ok the rear red turn signal lights were already a trend in the US before Tesla. But please reverse this too. It's very difficult to see blinking red lights on the freeway when it's sunny. For you people out there who buy cars with red blinking signal lights, I hate you.

19 minutes ago by versteegen

> Ok the rear red turn signal lights were already a trend in the US before Tesla. But please reverse this too.

I'm surprised. But it shouldn't be up to Tesla; it's illegal and they never get on the road in countries with proper regulations.

17 minutes ago by wilg

Tesla several years ago returned to amber turn signal lights the US (and always had them outside the US).

an hour ago by pudgywalsh

Allowing Silicon Valley dorks to redefine the established UIs of cars was one of the biggest mistakes of the last 10 years. Ultimately it's cost shaving, but it spread like a cancer to other manufacturers owing mostly to a TikTok-brained customer base (to their own detriment).

It's one of the reasons I refuse to own a new car. Zero reason to hide critical controls behind a touch screen.

My daily driver has all tactile controls. I can operate wipers, climate, radio, and all critical functions blindfolded.

30 minutes ago by frollogaston

It's probably because they started mandating reverse cameras. Which is great, but any cars without screens suddenly had them. At that point, it was probably cheaper to put the rest of the functionality on the screen.

9 minutes ago by roncesvalles

The reason is cost savings. It's cheaper to modify software UI than it is to modify hardware UI.

27 minutes ago by mrtesthah

This is ultimately a matter of corruption and a failure of government to regulate.

25 minutes ago by undefined
[deleted]
10 minutes ago by baybal2

[dead]

an hour ago by A_D_E_P_T

Good move. There's an interesting old article on the door handles here:

> https://medium.com/@arunchidambaram/is-teslas-door-handle-an...

In aerodynamic terms, door handles are nbd compared to side mirrors. Mirrors account for 6% of a car's aerodynamic drag. Door handles: roughly 0.2%. Basically they make no difference -- their effect is a rounding error -- and they were implemented for form-over-function style points.

an hour ago by sillysaurusx

Would it help to add a surface behind the side mirrors so that it's more aerodynamic? I'm thinking something that stretches from the car body to the side mirrors.

Or could the side mirrors could be shaped like an airplane's wing so that the air displaces nicely?

It'd look weird, but I'd rather have the fuel efficiency.

26 minutes ago by frollogaston

Sports car side mirrors are a deeper teardrop shape probably for this reason

39 minutes ago by eru

You could replace the mirrors with tiny cameras and screens inside the car, perhaps.

But not sure that would be legal.

12 minutes ago by jerlam

The tiny cameras show up a lot in concept cars, but illegal to have in the US. They've been trying to change the law for a while:

https://www.caranddriver.com/features/columns/a28120245/car-... (2019)

30 minutes ago by fxtentacle

That’s what big trucks use. Because you can use wide angle cameras and actually see more.

13 minutes ago by b112

But this is part of the problem. A mirror just works, or is very visibly broken if not. We want to have less electronic stuff in cars, not more. So I hope this isn't legal.

an hour ago by cherioo

What i hear is that electric door handle is more of a manufacturing cost-saving measure than an aerodynamic saving.

7 minutes ago by Rohansi

Is it really though? On a Tesla you have both the electronic button and manual door release from every door on the inside. You wouldn't need those manual releases if the doors weren't electronic.

an hour ago by frollogaston

Isn't it only the Model S that has those electric door handles that pop out on their own? And the cheaper Model 3 has hidden ones that you pop out yourself.

an hour ago by Shank

That's correct but the interior door handles are electronic buttons. When you pull the exterior handle, during the time when you pull the handle the car also lowers the windows so the door can open.

30 minutes ago by vrighter

"they are difficult to open in case of power failure"

"We'll just open the windows automatically using the same power that was lost"

44 minutes ago by hunglee2

this is a good move by China, hopefully its the end of the line for hidden door handles for EV's everywhere. Some things are cool but impractical; others are cool but dangerous.

8 minutes ago by yieldcrv

This current Chinese administration is great

Maybe Xi getting rid of generals in the party really helped many other high ranking officials step in line and step up in doing things for the people

an hour ago by protocolture

China just continuing to be the super reasonable one.

I wonder if the USA will double down and make hidden door handles mandatory, or just try and place a tariff on normal doors.

an hour ago by phs318u

> I wonder if the USA will double down and make hidden door handles mandatory

As long as they’re steam-powered.

28 minutes ago by foxglacier

Continuing?? Most Chinese domestic market cars can't be sold in the west because they're to dangerous or polluting. I'm sure they're getting stricter on both fronts but they're still behind developed countries.

20 minutes ago by runako

> dangerous or polluting

IIRC more than half of cars sold in China are EV or PHEV. I am receptive to learn that there are PHEVs that are too polluting to be sold in the west, but I would love to see the data.

10 minutes ago by victorbjorklund

Seems like old information. Pretty sure most new Chinese cards are electric.

18 minutes ago by nxpnsv

They’re pretty much dominating new electric cars in a lot of places now

5 minutes ago by baybal2

[dead]

an hour ago by lelandbatey

I hope there's more "no, your 'luxury' feature is just unsafe."

Being unable to turn on the windshield wipers (not engage for a swipe, turn on) without fully taking eyes off the road to interact with the giant touch screen, that's going to get people killed. The #1 thing that convinced me Teslas are absolutely unfit to operate safely for many common actions was driving one at all.

4 minutes ago by dllu

The windshield wiper controls are a physical button plus physical scroll wheel on the steering wheel. You don't have to touch the touchscreen.

7 minutes ago by jerlam

Tesla also cheaped out and didn't use a normal rain sensor for the wipers to enable auto mode, instead using "Tesla Vision". I've heard nothing but bad things about it.

Rain sensing was a solved problem and Tesla un-solved it.

35 minutes ago by m463

You can install aftermarket stalks. They're actually quite good now, and are available for 3/Y, S/X. (don't know about truck) Some early models used adhesive (SEXY brand?), skip those.

In the end, I think tesla is just stupid.

- removing dashboard in front of driver (3, y, cybertruck)

- non-round steering thing (model s/x yoke, cybertruck squircle)

- removing stalks

- touch-sensitive buttons on steering wheel

- critical controls on the touchscreen, usually behind a swipe or two. for example can't locate defrost on touchscreen without swiping

- can't remove non-critical music player overlay

- hard to find or touch-sensitive buttons for hazard lights

- tiny targets on touchscreen (for a moving car)

- so much overloading on center console (for a moving car)

I could go on and on.

There are plenty of things they get right.

The original model s was ok. Not as "super-clean" looking, but you had stalks with buttons for fingertip access to many things 1) turn signals, headlights, wipers 2) self drive functions 3) gear select with present handles when you pressed park button 4) adjust steering wheel position;

The original model s interior door handles were good - the lever to open the door had two functions. Pull the lever a little bit and it would electronically trigger the door release solenoid. But the same lever, pull it further and it would mechanically open the door. So the same lever would open the door with power or without power, no need to discover something new in an emergency.

the older UIs were easier to use (in a moving car). more old-school looking, but more contrast and bigger targets.

32 minutes ago by frollogaston

Yeah, everything about it seems trying too hard to be cool. My friend let me drive his new Tesla for a bit and I was like nah. Then a month later he was complaining to me how annoying it is to activate blinkers on it.

24 minutes ago by m463

it's also annoying to accidentally activate blinkers (or horn before they moved that). Then it is hard to cancel the blinkers, because you have to determine which one is presssed, and unpress it. choose the wrong one and you are back to cancelling the other one.

It is also just as hard to cancel the blinkers/lane change that FSD is attempting that you want to veto.

I have no idea what people behind you are thinking (or acting on)

an hour ago by pfannkuchen

To turn on the wipers you tap the button and scroll the wheel to select a speed. No touch screen required.

26 minutes ago by aaronbrethorst

whew, that's going to be a relief to the driver that hits an unexpected cloudburst while driving 80mph (130km) down the highway.

14 minutes ago by NoPicklez

And what would you do in any other car? You'd also maneuver a stalk which is almost no different from pressing a button

18 minutes ago by pfannkuchen

Yeah I dunno, I own one in the extremely rainy PNW and it’s fine. I was very apprehensive of using the touch screen for basic functions also but it turns out you don’t need to.

43 minutes ago by qwerpy

Reading and basic observational skills are required though. Apparently too much to ask.

36 minutes ago by matthewdgreen

[dead]

an hour ago by bpodgursky

From a more accessible article:

> BEIJING, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Tesla and eight other automakers said on Friday they will recall a total of about 4.3 million vehicles in China over concerns that doors may be difficult to open in an emergency, marking the country's largest automotive recall.

> Tesla's remedy includes warning labels and an update delivered remotely that automatically lowers vehicle windows after a collision.

Yes this is a recall and yes Tesla will be changing the design in the future but this is an industry-wide regulatory change and the automakers are being given considerable latitude to patch existing inventory while updating future designs. I am supportive of this change and it is also not a huge problem for Tesla (it's an over-the-air update) or even isolated to them.

an hour ago by nubinetwork

> that automatically lowers vehicle windows after a collision

I wonder how long until people figure out that tapping the bumper of a parked tesla opens all the windows, letting people either steal the infotainment screen, or the whole car...

an hour ago by left-struck

To detect impacts cars typically use sensors that require the entire car to experience significant acceleration, tapping the car definitely won’t do it.

12 minutes ago by esperent

What about body slamming it?

an hour ago by bpodgursky

Even in the US it's nearly impossible to steal a Tesla. In China with their omnipresent surveillance it would be suicidal to try.

an hour ago by bdangubic

it would be easier to climb mount everest barefoot than steal a Tesla in China

Daily Digest

Get a daily email with the the top stories from Hacker News. No spam, unsubscribe at any time.